(A) concluding that an inference is flawed on the grounds that it is based on a survey conducted by a biased party[No it says the inference is flawed because there is a similar situation in which inference is this(which is clearly flawed). He directly doesn't say anything about bias]
(B) referring to an inference that is clearly flawed in order to undermine an analogous inference[Yes! He gives an analogy]
(C) questioning the legitimacy of an inference by proposing a more reasonable inference that could be drawn from theevidence [Never proposed any other alternative inference]
(D) providing a direct counterexample to a conclusion in order to show that the conclusion is false[Didn't provide any counterexample]
(E) claiming that an inference leads to a contradiction in order to show that the inference is unreasonable[Nope]
...
(B) referring to an inference that is clearly flawed in order to undermine an analogous inference[Yes! He gives an analogy]
(C) questioning the legitimacy of an inference by proposing a more reasonable inference that could be drawn from theevidence [Never proposed any other alternative inference]
(D) providing a direct counterexample to a conclusion in order to show that the conclusion is false[Didn't provide any counterexample]
(E) claiming that an inference leads to a contradiction in order to show that the inference is unreasonable[Nope]
...
Statistics : Posted by thelastskybender • on 16 Aug 2018, 04:12 • Replies 3 • Views 2576
