The conclusion is in 20 years, it would be possible to reduce the number of murdersconsiderably
Basis: Embedding miniature devices in the mind of suspicious personnel who have a history of crime.
Gap: What if the devices do not work as efficiently or what if the users of the device are not able to draw correct inferences?
Aim: Weaken
A. Current privacy laws do not permit embedding monitoring devices in humans. Ok if laws do not permit embedding devices then you won't be able to read the state of mind. This weakens theconclusion
B. It is estimated that these devices will be expensive costing upwards of $5000/piece. Price of device is not an issue because th concern is whether we will be able to reduce murders using device. So this option isirrelevant
C. It was recently proved that techniques used by mind readers are not repeatable and will not hold their ground in the court of law. How does it matter whether it holds in court of law or not because we are mainly concerned
...
Basis: Embedding miniature devices in the mind of suspicious personnel who have a history of crime.
Gap: What if the devices do not work as efficiently or what if the users of the device are not able to draw correct inferences?
Aim: Weaken
A. Current privacy laws do not permit embedding monitoring devices in humans. Ok if laws do not permit embedding devices then you won't be able to read the state of mind. This weakens theconclusion
B. It is estimated that these devices will be expensive costing upwards of $5000/piece. Price of device is not an issue because th concern is whether we will be able to reduce murders using device. So this option isirrelevant
C. It was recently proved that techniques used by mind readers are not repeatable and will not hold their ground in the court of law. How does it matter whether it holds in court of law or not because we are mainly concerned
...
Statistics : Posted by wadhwakaran • on 06 Jan 2023, 01:30 • Replies 3 • Views 535









