Soubhik_Bardhan wrote:
omitting the eyes of in the above sentence can potentially make the meaning of the statement ambiguous. There is a real possibility of the sentence comparing the adaptability of elephant's eyes with the adaptability of another animal.
Correct analysis Soubhik.
Since there is ambiguity, we have to explicitly mention eyes in the second half of the sentence, to remove the ambiguity.
/pic9702455.jpg)
![Yuri Semenov YS Stereo Makeup v1.0.1 WiN Mac [FREE]](http://audioz.download/uploads/posts/2026-07/thumbs/1784473270_755743290.webp)
![Xamã & LUDMILLA – Moça – Single [iTunes Plus M4A]](http://i.imgur.com/olB1GdD.png)
